Avoid the astrology trap of using the Sidereal zodiac exclusively (or practitioners who do) or risk vast inaccuracies.
You’ve usually thought that you had a Sagittarius Sun sign, but then you might be confused when a friend shows you a “cooler” type of astrology, 1 which entirely changes what you notion you knew about your straightforward natal chart. You think, “How can I have a Scorpio Sun?” You don’t.
Sidereal zodiac (the zodiac of constellations) advocates will tell you, “…but Sidereal is the ‘oldest astrology,’ it’s the basis for Hindu astrology!”
While it is the basis for Hindu astrology, functional Chaldean and Greek predate horoscopic Hindu/Veda/Jyoti sh/Indian, and evidence shows that Hindu horoscope astrology borrowed heavily from these cultures.
You’re not alone if you’ve fallen in your smooth-talking World wide web marketer telling you that she’ll allow you to fix all your problems should you purchase her solutions and services based on the Sidereal zodiac. Her getting testimonials from big, recognizable names (who happen to use the same publishers in quite a few cases) approaches that she includes a great P.R. machine, that is all.
How to Escape This Trap
We recommend with the Tropical zodiac (and practitioners who do) instead as the principal zodiac. This can be the zodiac of Western astrology and it’s what you will discover at most non-Eastern astrology sites.
While we’re sure there exist talented astrologers in India who rely upon the Sidereal zodiac and have shaped their systems to be efficient during the real world, we have yet to encounter an American, European or other Western astrologer who uses the Sidereal zodiac exclusively and offers even consistently semi-acceptable accuracy rates.
If the practitioner who uses Sidereal is quite psychic and, or has created their personal unique, dependable technique using it, then perhaps they could be able to invest in consistently high accuracy. But our experience since the 1980s tells us that they don’t exist in The us or anywhere else within the Western world.
Your “Real” Signs
It should be said that you just won’t discover your “real Ascendant/Rising sign” (or “real Sun sign,” or “real Moon sign,” etc.) by while using Sidereal zodiac.
Make no mistake: you won’t learn “…what sign you incredibly are…” while using Sidereal zodiac (basis for Hindu/Vedic/Jyotish/Indian astrology), and it is not the “…true zodiac.” Don’t fall for this nonsense.
Sidereal Zodiac Origins
Usage with the Sidereal zodiac is from an era once practitioners had an inadequate understanding in the realities of our entire world and solar system. It was already formulated (in a very rough form) before the origins of horoscope astrology.
The origins on the genuine precise astrological horoscope (horoscope astrology), which includes the Ascendant or Rising sign, etc. is traced back to Hellenistic Egypt (about 330 BC – 30 BC). Prior to this time (when the Hindus adopted horoscope astrology), our findings show that Hindu astrology was basically an ambiguous spiritual philosophy, without having diverse methods for explicit delineation and prediction.
The Hindus borrowing the functional horoscope, which includes the Ascendant/Rising sign, from other cultures is surely acceptable, but using the Sidereal zodiac in conjunction with it effects in some technical concerns, as outlined below.
The Sidereal Zodiac system is according to fixed stars, hence the problem. We attach value to the fixed stars, but we do not like how the Sidereal system links the degrees in the Ecliptic to them.
The Genuine Ascendant
The actual Ascendant (Rising sign), in our opinion, is in which the Eastern horizon intercepts the Ecliptic. That is so inside the Tropical zodiac system, but not the Sidereal. Using that system, because of the contemporary 20+ degree difference in between the zodiacs, you’ll most likely have one more Ascendant, Sun sign, and Moon sign, among other differences.
Astrology, Zodiacs, and Jyotish – exclusive usage of Vedic Sidereal is a trap to Avoid – love compatibility and astrological compatibility